• X
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Maxxwell Hamilton
    • Jonathan Klurfeld
  • Reviews
  • Practice Areas
    • Real Estate
    • HOA/Condominium
    • Debt Collection
    • Criminal Defense
    • Car Accidents
    • Premises Liability
    • Lawsuits/Litigation
    • Insurance Claims
    • Foreclosure Defense
    • Business/Small Business
    • Contracts
    • Small Claims
    • Demand Letters
  • News
  • Guides
    • Foreclosure Process
    • Foreclosure FAQ/Definitions
    • Short Sale
    • Deed In Lieu
    • Foreclosure Tax Consequences
    • Car Accident To-Dos
    • Car Accident Laws and Insurance
    • Slip and Fall Guide
  • FAQ/Billing
  • Contact Us
  • info@HKLegalGroup.com

  • Boca Raton Office:

  • 754-900-1529

HK Legal Group
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Maxxwell Hamilton
    • Jonathan Klurfeld
  • Reviews
  • Practice Areas
    • Real Estate
    • HOA/Condominium
    • Debt Collection
    • Criminal Defense
    • Car Accidents
    • Premises Liability
    • Lawsuits/Litigation
    • Insurance Claims
    • Foreclosure Defense
    • Business/Small Business
    • Contracts
    • Small Claims
    • Demand Letters
  • News
  • Guides
    • Foreclosure Process
    • Foreclosure FAQ/Definitions
    • Short Sale
    • Deed In Lieu
    • Foreclosure Tax Consequences
    • Car Accident To-Dos
    • Car Accident Laws and Insurance
    • Slip and Fall Guide
  • FAQ/Billing
  • Contact Us

Case Law Updates

  • Home
  • /Real Estate
  • /Case Law Updates

A few interesting cases to note:

 Gunning vs. Equestleader.com, Inc., 2D16-2214 (Fla. 2d DCA October 13, 2017): The Curt found that once the parties entered into a contract for purchase of real property, that if buyer came upon the premises then seller could not file for trespass against buyer as buyer became equitable owner as of the date the purchase/sale contract was signed.

 Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company N.A. as Trustee v. Petrov et. al., 2D16-1536 (Fla. 2d DCA Oct. 6, 2017): The Court found that dismissal of the bank’s foreclosure case was improper as the trial court improperly found that servicer did not have authorization to prosecute the case on behalf of the lender.  The court found that servicer verifying the company and its witness testifying at trial did not amount to the servicer prosecuting the case for lender.

 Wincor v. Potash, Case No. 4D16-4351 (Fla. 4th DCA October 11, 2017): The Court upheld the long-standing principle that once can serve a tenant/occupant during an eviction/unlawful detainer case with summons via  posting on the door for possession only; any counts seeking any type of monetary judgement require personal service of the summons.

 

  • 22 October 2017
  • Real Estate
  •  0 Comments
  •  Like
Florida 5th District Court of Appeal Clarifies Foreclosure Statute of Limitations for Amounts Owed →← Get Your Hurricane Irma Insurance Claims in NOW!
0
Comments

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    • FREE Case Evaluation


    • Archives

    • Recent tags

      718 attorney's fees bartram boca raton foreclosure defense borrower condo condo fees condominium contract court default default date defense delray beach condominium HOA delray beach foreclosure defense Eviction Florida florida foreclosure statute florida statutes Florida Supreme Court foreclosure foreclosure defense foreclosure judgment foreclosure procedures foreclosure statute of limitations fort lauderdale condominium HOA fort lauderdale foreclosure defense HOA HOA fees homeowners landlord lis pendens loan loan modification Mortgage mortgage foreclosure palm beach condominium HOA palm beach foreclosure defense pre-foreclosure protecting tenants rent repeat foreclosures sale date standing stats
    • Accessibility Statement