• X
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Maxxwell Hamilton
    • Jonathan Klurfeld
  • Reviews
  • Practice Areas
    • Real Estate
    • HOA/Condominium
    • Debt Collection
    • Criminal Defense
    • Car Accidents
    • Premises Liability
    • Lawsuits/Litigation
    • Insurance Claims
    • Foreclosure Defense
    • Business/Small Business
    • Contracts
    • Small Claims
    • Demand Letters
  • News
  • Guides
    • Foreclosure Process
    • Foreclosure FAQ/Definitions
    • Short Sale
    • Deed In Lieu
    • Foreclosure Tax Consequences
    • Car Accident To-Dos
    • Car Accident Laws and Insurance
    • Slip and Fall Guide
  • FAQ/Billing
  • Contact Us
  • info@HKLegalGroup.com

  • Boca Raton Office:

  • 754-900-1529

HK Legal Group
  • Home
  • Attorneys
    • Maxxwell Hamilton
    • Jonathan Klurfeld
  • Reviews
  • Practice Areas
    • Real Estate
    • HOA/Condominium
    • Debt Collection
    • Criminal Defense
    • Car Accidents
    • Premises Liability
    • Lawsuits/Litigation
    • Insurance Claims
    • Foreclosure Defense
    • Business/Small Business
    • Contracts
    • Small Claims
    • Demand Letters
  • News
  • Guides
    • Foreclosure Process
    • Foreclosure FAQ/Definitions
    • Short Sale
    • Deed In Lieu
    • Foreclosure Tax Consequences
    • Car Accident To-Dos
    • Car Accident Laws and Insurance
    • Slip and Fall Guide
  • FAQ/Billing
  • Contact Us

5th DCA Holds Surrender In Bankruptcy and You Forfeit The Right To Defend Foreclosure

  • Home
  • /Foreclosure
  • /5th DCA Holds Surrender In Bankruptcy and You Forfeit The Right To Defend Foreclosure

The 5th DCA decently dismissed an appeal by a borrower after the borrower admitted that borrower stated their intent to surrender the property in the bankruptcy case; and thus waved any further right to defend foreclosure.  Opinion here.

The borrower filed for bankruptcy while his appeal of the foreclosure action was still pending in state court.   The 5th DCA keyed on the point that the bankruptcy court entered an order confirming the debt and the borrower’s surrender of the property.   Citing a recent bankruptcy court ruling from the Middle District of Florida Bankrutcy Court with a similar holding (In re Metzler, 530 B.R. 894, 900 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 2015), the appeal was dismissed.

The 5th DCA held that in bankruptcy “the term ‘surrender’ means that a debtor must relinquish secured property and make it available to the secured creditor by refraining from taking any overt act that impedes a secured creditor’s ability to foreclose its interest in secured property.”

The 5th DCA found that the borrower’s “actions and the orders of the bankruptcy court have fully resolved this matter.”

This ruling is in stark contrast to a recent Southern District of Florida Bankruptcy Miami Division ruling by Judge Isicoff which found that “c]ompulsory surrender of real property collateral by a debtor to a lienholder in chapter 7 is not supported by, and indeed ignores, the express provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.”.  Opinion here.

Judge Isicoff, refusing to follow the other rulings finding that a surrender meant that borrower forfeited the right to defend the underlying foreclosure action, held that because “[t]hat result is what the Bankruptcy Code provides, and any modification to that result is up to Congress, not the courts”, a chapter 7 debtor who “indicates surrender of real property in his statement of intention is not obligated to surrender that property to the lienholder, whether or not the property is administered by the chapter 7 trustee. Compulsory surrender of real property collateral by a debtor to a lienholder in chapter 7 is not supported by, and indeed ignores the express provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.”

Foreclosure cases with bankruptcy components are very fact and area specific.  Please contact us to discuss the facts of your case today.

  • 17 June 2016
  • Foreclosure
  •  0 Comments
  •  Like
  • bankruptcy , bankruptcy court , Chapter 7 , defend foreclosure , foreclosure , foreclosure defense , foreclosure procedures , surrender
Related Posts
  • 4th DCA Holds That Property’s Incorrect Legal Description Does NOT Require A New Case To Be Filed Or Warrant Dismissal
  • Florida 5th District Court of Appeal Clarifies Foreclosure Statute of Limitations for Amounts Owed
  • Florida 3rd DCA Rejects Statute of Limitations Dismissal Per “All Subsequent Payments”
  • 4th DCA Reverses Sanctions Against Bank
If Doing a Payoff/Reinstatement In Foreclosure CHECK YOUR LETTER ASAP FOR ILLEGAL CHARGES! →← 4th DCA Reverses Dismissal of Foreclosure For Unclean Hands by Borrower
0
Comments

    Leave a Reply Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    • FREE Case Evaluation

    • Archives

    • Recent tags

      718 attorney's fees bartram borrower condo condo fees condominium contract court cure default default date defense delray beach condominium HOA delray beach foreclosure defense Eviction Florida florida foreclosure statute florida statutes Florida Supreme Court foreclosure foreclosure defense foreclosure judgment foreclosure procedures foreclosure statute of limitations fort lauderdale condominium HOA fort lauderdale foreclosure defense HOA HOA fees homeowners landlord lawsuit lis pendens loan loan modification Mortgage mortgage foreclosure palm beach condominium HOA palm beach foreclosure defense pre-foreclosure protecting tenants rent repeat foreclosures sale date stats
    • Boca Raton Mailing Address:
      1279 W Palmetto Park Rd #272896
      Boca Raton, FL 33427